• About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Newsletter
  • Podcasts
  • Digital Magazine
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Self Development
  • Growth
  • Finance
  • Marketing
  • Technology
  • Sustainability
  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Newsletter
  • Podcasts
  • Digital Magazine
NZBusiness Magazine

Type and hit Enter to search

Linkedin Facebook Instagram Youtube
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Self Development
  • Growth
  • Finance
  • Marketing
  • Technology
  • Sustainability
NZBusiness Magazine
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Self Development
  • Growth
  • Finance
  • Marketing
  • Technology
  • Sustainability
Opinion

Employment Matters

Employee pinged $50k for flagrant disloyaltyBrandon Brown uses a recent ERA case to highlight how disloyal employees can breach their employment agreement by competing with their employer before they even […]

NZBusiness Editorial Team
NZBusiness Editorial Team
October 16, 2013 3 Mins Read
1.3K

Employee pinged $50k for flagrant disloyalty
Brandon Brown uses a recent ERA case to highlight how disloyal employees can breach their employment agreement by competing with their employer before they even leave their employ.  

In the last issue of NZBusiness (October 2013) we wrote about restraint of trade agreements and how they can protect your business. As a follow on, this article discusses how disloyal employees can breach their employment agreements by competing with their employer before they even leave their employ.  
In the recent Employment Relations Authority (ERA) case Zeald NZ Ltd v Bernard, Mr Bernard was found to have breached his employment agreement at least 263 times, with actions including:
• Copying and removing the employer, Zeald’s, intellectual property and confidential information for his own use.
• Soliciting three of Zeald’s employees to leave their employment.
• Soliciting business from 51 of Zeald’s customers (ten while he was still employed).
• Working for a competitor of Zeald whilst still employed and during the period of his restraint of trade.
Bernard was employed by Zeald as a website results specialist and had in-depth interaction with customers in planning their websites. His employment agreement included confidentiality and restraint of trade clauses that applied after his employment ended.
During the last three days of his employment, while on annual leave, he started working for a competitor company. He also took 50 business cards of Zeald’s customers, along with a flash drive containing confidential information including the website planning and online strategy documents of 100 of Zeald’s customers. Bernard used Zeald’s website planning template to help the competitor prepare templates. He even emailed the company while still working at Zeald, suggesting how Zeald’s processes could be used for their advantage. Bernard also admitted to the private investigator that he had a vendetta against Zeald.
To compound the sense of injury to the employer, Zeald had endeavoured to treat Bernard well during the course of his employment, by giving him a 20 percent unsolicited pay rise and told him it was an encouragement to him regarding his long term future with the company.   
The ERA considered that Bernard’s breaches were serious, flagrant, deliberate and ongoing, and that a significant penalty was necessary to punish him and deter other employees from that type of conduct.
Bernard was ordered to pay Zeald damages of $6,778.17 for the cost of the private investigator, plus damages of $937 for the income Bernard received from the competing work and penalties of $50,000.  

Recovering damages and penalties
The substantial penalties awarded in favour of the employer make this case exceptional. Under the Employment Relations Act 2000, penalties of up to $10,000 can be awarded against an individual for a breach of the employment agreement. Penalties can be awarded on a per breach basis, or on a global overall basis as was done in this case.
To stop the competing activities concerned, early injunctive relief is often sought. However, whether the ERA will actually award monetary remedies and the quantum of that relief can be uncertain. A major challenge for employers is that damages will only be awarded for loss proven to be caused by the breach. Zeald only claimed $937 in damages from money Bernard received through doing work for third parties.
However, the Zeald case demonstrates that in appropriate cases, the ERA will consider awarding substantial penalties, in addition to the compensation available which directly arises from the breach of contract.   

Written and implied terms of an employment agreement
The Zeald case highlights the enforceability of implied terms of employment such as the duty of fidelity that will apply regardless of whether they are written into an employment agreement. The duty of fidelity is multifaceted but generally requires that an employee not engage in conduct that is likely to damage an employer’s business or which significantly undermines the relationship of trust and confidence.
This case reminds us that agreements should include confidentiality, intellectual property, and restraint of trade clauses to expressly protect their business interests, post-termination.
Despite the Zeald case, employers should be cautious in factoring in penalties in deciding whether to bring a claim against a former employee.  
The ERA and Court can award penalties to the Crown or to the employer, and there is no guarantee the penalty will be payable to the employer.  
Seek specific legal advice at two crucial stages: before presenting an employment agreement to a prospective employee, to carefully draft the necessary terms; and when you have reason to suspect an employee has breached their agreement.    
Swift action may be required to stop the competing activities and then to recover damages and possibly penalties for the employee’s actions.  

Brandon Brown is a solicitor at EMALegal, the Employers and Manufacturers Association www.ema.co.nz

Share Article

NZBusiness Editorial Team
Follow Me Written By

NZBusiness Editorial Team

NZBusiness is a team effort, with article submissions curated by a small team of professionals under the guidance of Editor David Nothling-Demmer.

Other Articles

Start-with-hello_0
Previous

Converting today’s stranger into tomorrow’s client

Next

Professional Business Networking

Next
October 16, 2013

Professional Business Networking

Previous
October 16, 2013

Converting today’s stranger into tomorrow’s client

Start-with-hello_0

Subscribe to our newsletter

NZBusiness Digital Issue – March 2025

READ MORE

The Latest

From redundancy to resilience

May 16, 2025

Episode 16: Bryce Marsden on sustainable impact through education, youth and environment

May 15, 2025

The high cost of leadership neglect

May 14, 2025

Why making Auckland a Tech Hub makes sense

May 14, 2025

Is AI making us happier? Why some Kiwi leaders would trade coffee for Generative AI

May 13, 2025

Step back to move forward – how Kiwi business owners can unlock growth

May 12, 2025

Most Popular

NZBusiness Digital Issue – June 2024
Understanding AI
Navigating economic headwinds: Insights for SME owners
How much AI data is generated every 60 seconds? New report reveals global AI use
Nourishing success: Sam Bridgewater on his entrepreneurship journey with The Pure Food Co

Related Posts

The high cost of leadership neglect

May 14, 2025

Is AI making us happier? Why some Kiwi leaders would trade coffee for Generative AI

May 13, 2025

Step back to move forward – how Kiwi business owners can unlock growth

May 12, 2025

The state of our environment as a call to adventure

May 5, 2025
NZBusiness Magazine

New Zealand’s leading source for business news, training guides and opinion from small businesses to multi-national corporations.

© Pure 360 Limited.
All Rights Reserved.

Quick Links

  • Advertise with us
  • Magazine issues
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Sitemap

Categories

  • News
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Growth
  • Finance
  • Education & Development
  • Marketing
  • Technology
  • Sustainability

Follow Us

LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
YouTube
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Self Development
  • Growth
  • Finance
  • Marketing
  • Technology
  • Sustainability